NAME: KATA VISHISHTA GOUD

REGISTER NO: 24113114

Assignment Description: CIA III

Course Title: Gender, Diversity, and Inclusion in Organizational Management.

Course Code: LAW321

TOPIC: International Conventions and Human Rights:

The Role of CEDAW and UDHR in Advancing Women’s Equality – An Analytical Study of Legal Frameworks and Enforcement Mechanisms .

Abstract

Women’s rights have not always occupied a central place within the framework of international law. The evolution that brought gender equality to the forefront represents one of the most significant transformations in the way legal scholars and policymakers understand global justice. This paper explores the most influential international agreements that propelled the advancement of women’s rights, with a particular focus on the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). It traces the development of women’s rights throughout the twentieth century, examining how these landmark conventions not only inspired the adoption and revision of national laws but also established enduring standards that continue to shape legal practice. By analyzing the non-discrimination principle at the core of CEDAW, this paper highlights how international law addresses both direct and indirect barriers to equality. Furthermore, it considers the enduring importance of Article 1 of the UDHR, which provides the foundational language for equality and dignity in human rights discourse, and examines how this article influences the interpretation of women’s rights protections across various legal systems. These legal instruments remain powerful tools in the ongoing struggle for substantive equality, offering mechanisms for accountability and avenues for advocacy. Drawing on Bluebook-style sources, the argument is advanced that these international agreements have done more than articulate an aspirational vision for gender justice they have constructed a durable legal infrastructure that underpins women’s empowerment and transforms the lived realities of women on a global scale. By fostering legal obligations and standard-setting, CEDAW and the UDHR have ensured that the commitment to women’s rights is not merely rhetorical but is embedded in binding norms that continue to shape policy, fuel social movements, and drive progress toward genuine equality.

1. Introduction

After World War II, international human rights law didn’t just tweak the rules it completely transformed how the global community thinks and talks about dignity, equality, and justice. The atrocities committed by totalitarian regimes during the war forced the world to confront a stark reality: there needed to be an international system in place that could protect the fundamental rights of every individual, with no exceptions or loopholes. This realization was powerful, leading to a widespread acknowledgment that justice and dignity couldn’t be left up to individual governments or left vulnerable to the ideologies of those in power. And within this sweeping movement for universal rights, including women’s rights as a core part of the agenda was truly revolutionary. While it’s true that women’s suffrage movements throughout the 1800s and early 1900s had already achieved important victories in some places, the broader picture remained bleak entrenched gender inequality persisted almost everywhere, and women’s rights were still seen as secondary, if they were recognized at all.

Then, in 1945, the United Nations Charter was adopted, marking a pivotal moment. For the first time, a binding multilateral treaty didn’t just allude to the principle of equality it stated it clearly and unequivocally. The Charter explicitly declared that one of the United Nations’ foundational purposes was “to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women.” This wasn’t mere idealistic rhetoric; it was a bold statement that set a new standard for the international community. The Charter laid the essential groundwork for a series of future treaties and legal instruments that would go on to treat gender equality not as a distant or aspirational goal, but as a concrete legal obligation that states would be held accountable for.

Two landmark documents especially illustrate this progression: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in 1948 and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) in 1979. These texts are not just significant on their own they are deeply interconnected, representing different stages in the evolution of global gender equality. The UDHR articulates equality and human rights in broad, sweeping, and moral terms, establishing a universal standard that all people, regardless of gender, are entitled to certain inalienable rights. However, while the UDHR set out the vision, it left much of the practical implementation to future efforts. This is where CEDAW comes in: building on the UDHR’s foundation, CEDAW creates a detailed legal framework designed to eliminate discrimination and ensure that the principles of equality are translated into real-world protections for women. CEDAW compels states to take active measures to address legal, social, and cultural barriers to equality, making the commitment to women’s rights enforceable and specific.

Taken together, the UDHR and CEDAW chart a clear course for the international community: from the articulation of sweeping ideals about human dignity and equality to the establishment of binding, enforceable commitments that aim to make gender equality a reality in every country. This progression reflects not only a shift in legal standards but also a broader transformation in attitudes and expectations about the place of women in society and the meaning of justice itself. The journey from broad moral declarations to specific legal obligations demonstrates how the world moved from merely envisioning equality to building the structures necessary to achieve it.

2. Role of CEDAW in Addressing Discrimination

CEDAW is recognized as the most comprehensive international treaty addressing the legal, political, and social rights of women worldwide. It was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly in December 1979 and officially entered into force by September 1981. Since then, almost every member state of the United Nations has ratified it, making it one of the most widely endorsed human rights instruments. Article 1 makes its purpose clear by defining “discrimination against women” as any distinction, exclusion, or restriction based on sex that prevents women from fully enjoying their human rights and fundamental freedoms.

The true significance of CEDAW lies not only in its formal acknowledgment of equality but also in its insistence on achieving substantive equality. The Convention requires states to go beyond superficial changes and to address the underlying structures and systems that perpetuate inequality and discrimination. Articles 2 and 3 specifically oblige countries to embed the principle of equality into their constitutions and national laws, to ensure that women have effective legal protection through the courts and legislation, and to take concrete steps to eliminate all forms of discrimination against women, whether explicit or hidden.

Furthermore, Articles 10 through 14 detail a wide range of obligations in critical sectors such as education, employment, health care, and rural development. CEDAW’s holistic approach acknowledges that discrimination against women is not limited to overt state actions or policies, but can be deeply rooted in private spheres, including within families, communities, and cultural traditions. By extending its reach to both public and private life, CEDAW marked a significant shift from earlier human rights treaties, which tended to focus only on state responsibilities, leaving private and cultural domains largely unaddressed.

The impact of CEDAW has been amplified by the work of the CEDAW Committee, whose interpretive guidance most notably through its General Recommendations has clarified and expanded the Convention’s scope. For example, General Recommendation No. 19, issued in 1992, was groundbreaking in recognizing gender-based violence as a form of discrimination under Article 1. By doing so, it brought issues like domestic violence, sexual harassment, and other forms of abuse firmly into the domain of international human rights law, demanding that states treat such violence as a violation of women’s rights and take appropriate action to prevent and remedy it.

CEDAW’s legacy is thus one of demanding not just formal equality or legal recognition, but real change in the daily lives of women. It calls on countries to challenge deep-seated norms, transform institutions, and foster a culture where women’s rights are understood, respected, and protected at every level of society. Through its continuing evolution and the ongoing work of the CEDAW Committee, the Convention remains a powerful tool for advancing gender equality and protecting the rights of women and girls around the world.

3. Evolution of Women’s Rights Through 20th-Century International Conventions

If you want to understand the trajectory of women’s rights throughout the twentieth century, you need to begin with a succession of major international legal milestones that propelled gender equality from the margins to the very heart of the global agenda. These milestones not only signaled changing attitudes, but also created mechanisms for holding states accountable and advancing reforms worldwide.

3.1 Early Developments

During the inter-war years, the issue of women’s status was largely overlooked by international organizations. The League of Nations did set up the Committee on the Status of Women in 1937, yet its impact was minimal, reflecting the limited political will of the time. It wasn’t until after World War II, with the founding of the United Nations in 1945, that the international community began to actively promote women’s rights. In 1946, the UN established the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), a pioneering body mandated to advance women’s rights in political, economic, civil, social, and educational domains, laying the groundwork for future progress.

The adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in 1948 marked another turning point. The UDHR famously proclaimed that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights, for the first time articulating the principle of universal human rights in a way that included women. Although the UDHR was not a binding treaty, it set a powerful moral and legal benchmark that influenced the interpretation of subsequent laws and inspired a generation of rights activism.

3.2 Mid-Century Instruments

The momentum for women’s rights kept growing in the postwar decades. The Convention on the Political Rights of Women, adopted in 1952, was a landmark treaty that guaranteed women the right to vote and to participate fully in public office an explicit recognition of women’s political agency and citizenship. This was a significant advance, particularly for countries where women were still denied these basic rights.

A decade later, in 1962, the Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages was adopted. This treaty confronted deeply entrenched patriarchal customs by demanding that marriage be entered into only with the free and full consent of both parties, and by setting minimum standards for the age and registration of marriage. These measures sought to protect women and girls from forced and child marriages, addressing a root cause of gender inequality in many societies.

The drive for change did not slow. In 1967, the Declaration on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women was adopted. This declaration went beyond simply condemning discrimination; it argued that denying women equal rights violated not only the dignity of women but also threatened the foundations of justice and world peace. For the first time, these concepts were formally articulated in international legal language, paving the way for the negotiation of a comprehensive and binding treaty.

3.3 Late 20th-Century Consolidation

By the 1970s, the movement for women’s rights had achieved a truly global scope. The United Nations designated 1975 as International Women’s Year and convened the first World Conference on Women in Mexico City, bringing together activists, policymakers, and governments from around the world. The World Plan of Action adopted at this conference provided a blueprint for advancing gender equality and became the basis for the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), which was adopted in 1979 and is often described as an international bill of rights for women.

The momentum continued into the 1990s with the landmark Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995. The resulting Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action broadened the scope of the women’s rights agenda, explicitly including economic, reproductive, and environmental rights as integral to gender equality. This expanded vision acknowledged the interconnectedness of different forms of discrimination and the need for comprehensive strategies to achieve real change.

Altogether, these developments form a clear narrative: in the early twentieth century, the world began to acknowledge the legitimacy of women’s rights; gradually, these rights were codified into international law; and, over time, states and international organizations began to implement and enforce these standards, setting the stage for ongoing efforts toward true equality.

4. Influence of Human Rights Conventions on National Women’s Rights Laws

International human rights conventions extend far beyond the confines of international diplomacy they have been catalysts for profound change within individual nations, prompting governments to reevaluate their legal frameworks, draft new constitutions, and influence the interpretative lens through which judges understand and protect rights. When states ratify agreements such as CEDAW, they are not simply signing a symbolic document rather, they often embark on a process that requires real transformation within their own legal orders.

4.1 Constitutional and Legislative Reforms

Consider the examples of South Africa, India, and Brazil. Each country has woven the principle of equality into the very fabric of their constitutions, directly drawing from the central tenets of CEDAW. In India, for instance, Article 15 explicitly prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. This was not merely a reflection of domestic priorities; India’s ratification of CEDAW in 1993 served to reinforce and reaffirm its dedication to these ideals. Kenya took a parallel route when it adopted its 2010 Constitution, which is infused with CEDAW’s standards and guarantees equal rights in areas such as political participation and property ownership. These constitutional developments are not isolated gestures they signal a deliberate effort to harmonize national values with international human rights commitments.

The impact of CEDAW and similar conventions is not confined to constitutional texts. A wide array of countries have either enacted new legislation or substantially revised existing laws to align with CEDAW’s requirements. Australia, for example, enacted the Sex Discrimination Act in 1984, which marked a pivotal step towards gender equality in the country’s legal landscape. The United States, responding in part to global advocacy, introduced the Violence Against Women Act in 1994, addressing systemic issues of gender-based violence. These legislative changes are emblematic of a broader trend a global shift in which nations internalize and adapt international human rights norms, reshaping domestic law to reflect evolving standards of justice and equality.

4.2 Judicial Incorporation

The influence of international conventions is also increasingly evident in the way national courts interpret and apply the law. Judges are drawing upon international agreements to resolve complex legal dilemmas and to ensure that domestic laws are consistent with global human rights principles. In Nepal, for instance, the Supreme Court invoked CEDAW in the landmark case Forum for Women, Law and Development v. His Majesty’s Government (2002), using its provisions to strike down discriminatory citizenship laws that denied women equal rights. Similarly, the Supreme Court of India, in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997), relied on CEDAW to craft binding legal standards against sexual harassment in the workplace, filling gaps where domestic law had previously been silent.

These cases exemplify what is known as the doctrine of incorporation. This doctrine allows international norms to exert influence on domestic jurisprudence even in the absence of explicit legislative action. Courts, by referencing international conventions, can reinterpret and expand the meaning of existing laws, ensuring that they are consistent with the country’s international obligations. This dynamic shows how deeply international human rights standards can penetrate a nation’s legal system, sometimes driving transformation from within the judiciary itself. The ripple effects of such judicial engagement can be profound, leading to broader recognition and protection of rights and fostering a culture in which international human rights are not just abstract ideals, but practical standards that shape everyday legal realities.

5. Principle of Non-Discrimination Under CEDAW

CEDAW is built on a simple yet transformative principle: no discrimination, in any form. It urges states to go beyond superficial measures and ensure that women achieve genuine equality not just through legal guarantees, but in the reality of daily life. Passing laws is only the first step those laws have to be matched by real-world changes so that women aren’t held back by hidden barriers in society, at work, or in their communities.

5.1 Substantive Equality

Substantive equality demands more than just formal, equal treatment; it digs into the roots of inequality to actively dismantle the structures that disadvantage women. The goal is to reshape the landscape so that women have the same opportunities as men, not just on paper but in practice. CEDAW recognizes that special measures like quotas and affirmative action, as outlined in Article 4(1) are sometimes necessary to accelerate progress toward equality. These actions aren’t mere exceptions to the rule; as the CEDAW Committee emphasized in General Recommendation No. 25, they are indispensable strategies for addressing the persistent inequalities that women face. By allowing and even encouraging such measures, CEDAW acknowledges the reality that past and present discrimination cannot be overcome by neutral policies alone; proactive steps are essential.

5.2 Intersectionality

CEDAW’s approach to discrimination is both comprehensive and forward-thinking. It understands that gender-based discrimination is often compounded by other forms of disadvantage such as race, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, disability, or age. As a result, women at the intersection of these identities can experience unique and intensified barriers. The CEDAW Committee draws attention to the need for targeted policies that address these intersecting forms of discrimination, highlighting the importance of nuanced solutions that take everyone’s lived experiences into account. This reflects a key insight of contemporary feminism: gender inequality can’t be tackled in isolation. The interplay of multiple factors creates a complex web of disadvantage, and effective solutions must be equally multifaceted tailored to address the specific challenges faced by different groups of women. By promoting this intersectional approach, CEDAW lays the groundwork for a broader, more inclusive vision of gender justice, ensuring that no woman is left behind.

6. Enforcement Mechanisms of CEDAW

CEDAW established the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women to ensure that countries fulfill their obligations and remain answerable for their progress. This Committee is composed of independent experts from around the world, whose primary role is to monitor and evaluate the extent to which states are implementing the commitments they made under the Convention. By bringing together diverse perspectives and expertise, the Committee fosters an environment where international standards for women’s rights are not only maintained but actively advanced.

6.1 Reporting and Review Article 18 of CEDAW stipulates that every member country must submit a comprehensive report to the Committee every four years. These reports detail the actions, legislative measures, and policies a nation has adopted to align with CEDAW’s requirements and to promote gender equality. The Committee meticulously examines each report, engaging in dialogue with state representatives and sometimes inviting input from civil society organizations. Following this thorough review process, the Committee issues concluding observations, which are essentially a set of recommendations tailored to each country. These recommendations highlight areas where progress has been made, identify ongoing challenges, and urge countries to take specific steps to better uphold the rights of women and eliminate discriminatory practices.

6.2 Optional Protocol The adoption of the Optional Protocol in 1999 marked a significant advancement in CEDAW’s enforcement mechanisms. This Protocol introduced two critical procedures: first, an individual complaints process that allows women, or groups of women, to bring claims of rights violations directly before the Committee after exhausting domestic remedies; and second, an inquiry procedure that enables the Committee to investigate grave or systematic abuses of women’s rights within a state. Through these mechanisms, the Committee has addressed landmark cases such as A.T. v. Hungary (2005), in which Hungary’s inadequate protection of a woman facing domestic violence was found to breach Articles 2 and 5 of the Convention. Cases like this set important precedents and clarify the obligations of states in protecting women from all forms of violence and discrimination.

Although the Committee’s findings and recommendations are not legally binding in the same way as court judgments, they are highly influential. National governments and judicial systems often take the Committee’s decisions into serious consideration, and its authoritative guidance shapes both domestic policy and international legal standards. In effect, the Committee serves as a quasi-judicial body within the context of international human rights law, providing oversight, guidance, and accountability to ensure that the vision of gender equality enshrined in CEDAW is progressively realized around the world.

7. Article 1 of the UDHR: Dignity and Equality for Women

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted on December 10, 1948, continues to serve as the foundation for human rights standards across the globe. Article 1 lays out its principle in straightforward terms: “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” Though these words are intentionally gender-neutral, this declaration marked a significant break from the long history of patriarchy that had relegated women to a subordinate status beneath men. The statement challenged deeply rooted social norms and legal systems that denied women equal standing, making it a pivotal moment in the global pursuit of equality.

The story behind the drafting of the Declaration reveals even more about its significance. Women such as Eleanor Roosevelt, who chaired the UN Commission on Human Rights, and Hansa Mehta from India, played active and influential roles—not just as participants, but as key architects of the inclusive language that defines the document. Hansa Mehta, in particular, was instrumental in ensuring that the phrase “all human beings” replaced the original “all men,” a change that made the Declaration’s guarantee of equality explicitly inclusive of women. Their efforts were crucial in making sure that the promise of universal rights truly extended to everyone, regardless of gender, and set a new standard for international human rights language.

By rooting the concept of equality in the inherent dignity of every individual, the UDHR established a powerful precedent that would shape future human rights instruments. This approach recognized that equality was not just a matter of legal rights, but also of fundamental human worth. Subsequent landmark documents, such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), echoed these principles, directly connecting women’s equality to the dignity and value of every person. In this way, the UDHR not only challenged past injustices but also laid the groundwork for ongoing efforts to achieve true equality for women and all people worldwide.

8. Significance of the UDHR in Advancing Women’s Rights

The UDHR has left an indelible imprint on legal systems worldwide, despite its status as a non-binding instrument. Its influence extends far beyond its original adoption, serving as the bedrock for a multitude of international treaties, national constitutions, and judicial decisions that have tangibly advanced women’s rights across the globe. By articulating universal principles of equality and dignity, the UDHR provided a shared language and moral imperative that lawmakers, activists, and judges could invoke in the ongoing struggle for gender justice.

8.1 Institutional Impact  

The adoption of the UDHR created the momentum necessary for the establishment of key bodies focused on women’s rights, such as the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW). The CSW played a pivotal role in the early years, working to draft foundational conventions addressing women’s political participation and marriage rights, such as the Convention on the Political Rights of Women and the Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages. The UDHR’s core values also profoundly shaped the drafting of the International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), both of which were finalized in 1966. These covenants transformed the UDHR’s aspirational promises into binding legal commitments, further embedding gender equality into international law.

8.2 Influence on Global Policy  

The foundational ideals of the UDHR are visible in the fabric of global policy initiatives. Its vision of universal human rights resonates throughout landmark frameworks like the Beijing Platform for Action (1995), which set comprehensive targets for achieving gender equality and empowering women worldwide. The UDHR’s enduring relevance is also evident in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly Goal 5, which explicitly aims to achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. These global agendas draw upon the UDHR’s principles to foster accountability, guide national policy reforms, and inspire grassroots activism, helping to ensure that gender equality remains a central concern for the international community.

8.3 Judicial and Cultural Transformation  

Courts at both the national and international levels regularly invoke the UDHR as a guiding authority in gender rights litigation. For example, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, in its landmark decision in Gonzales v. Mexico (Campo Algodonero) (2009), relied heavily on the UDHR’s principle of equality when addressing the issue of gender-based violence and holding states accountable for failing to protect women. The influence of the UDHR goes far beyond written law and courtroom decisions; it has fundamentally shifted cultural attitudes towards gender. By affirming that gender equality is not simply an aspirational objective or a matter of policy preference, but an inherent human right inseparable from human dignity, the UDHR has helped reshape societal expectations, emboldening movements for change and encouraging individuals to demand respect, protection, and fulfillment of their rights. Its legacy is not only seen in legal documents and policies but also in the evolving consciousness of societies around the world, where the concept of gender equality is increasingly recognized as a core component of justice and human flourishing.

9. Challenges and Contemporary Relevance

Even with the legal protections enshrined in the UDHR and CEDAW, gender inequality remains deeply entrenched across the globe. Persistent wage gaps, ongoing gender-based violence, restrictions on reproductive rights, and the underrepresentation of women in leadership positions all continue to plague societies even in countries that claim to uphold robust legal frameworks for equality. These persistent issues demonstrate that passing laws is only one step; meaningful implementation and cultural transformation are far more elusive.

9.1 Reservations and Non-Compliance

Many states continue to attach reservations to CEDAW, particularly regarding sensitive areas like family law and religious traditions. For example, a number of Middle Eastern countries have reserved Articles 2 and 16, contending that these provisions are incompatible with Sharia law and their local customs. Such reservations undermine the universality of women’s rights and reveal the persistent tension between respecting cultural or religious traditions and adhering to international legal standards. This ongoing struggle exposes the limits of international agreements when faced with deeply rooted societal norms and highlights the difficulty of achieving consensus on the definition and scope of women’s rights worldwide.

9.2 Enforcement Limitations

The effectiveness of CEDAW’s enforcement mechanisms largely depends on the political will of individual states, rather than any binding authority to compel compliance. While the CEDAW Committee can issue recommendations and reviews, these carry mostly moral or symbolic weight rather than legal force. In reality, many governments delay action or submit superficial, non-substantive reports to fulfill their obligations on paper without real change on the ground. Scholars like Hilary Charlesworth emphasize that it is often domestic activism, grassroots movements, and national courts that drive meaningful progress on gender equality, using international conventions as tools for advocacy and legal argument rather than relying on top-down enforcement.

9.3 Emerging Frontiers

The landscape of gender equality is not static; it continues to evolve as new issues come to the fore. In recent years, digital rights, climate justice, and patterns of migration have joined the conversation, each presenting unique and complex gendered dimensions. For instance, online harassment and algorithmic bias affect women’s participation in digital spaces, while climate change disproportionately impacts women in vulnerable communities, and migration can expose women to heightened risks of exploitation and violence. International conventions must adapt to these shifting realities, ensuring that gender-responsive perspectives are woven into emerging legal frameworks and policy debates as these new challenges arise. Only by continuously updating and expanding our understanding of gender equality can international legal standards remain relevant and effective in an ever-changing world.

10. Conclusion

When you trace the evolution from the UDHR’s initial proclamation of universal dignity to CEDAW’s uncompromising demand for women’s equality, you witness a profound transformation in the landscape of international law. These foundational documents did more than simply articulate women’s rights in theory they translated those ideals into concrete realities, endowed them with legal authority, and established binding obligations that states are required to respect and enforce. 

The UDHR served as the bedrock, laying out the fundamental moral framework for human rights by declaring that all people are born free and equal in dignity and rights. It set the tone for a new global ethic, emphasizing the inherent worth of every individual. Building on this philosophical foundation, CEDAW provided the necessary legal mechanisms, introducing enforceable provisions and specific commitments aimed at eliminating discrimination and advancing substantive equality for women. By embedding principles of non-discrimination, genuine equality, and explicit state responsibility into international law, these instruments did more than just reframe rights on paper they redefined the concept of justice itself for half of humanity, creating a new standard by which societies could be measured.

Yet, despite these advancements, the journey toward true equality is far from complete. Persistent and deeply entrenched inequalities, cultural and societal resistance, and inadequate enforcement continue to undermine the full realization of women’s rights. In many regions, progress remains slow, and long-standing stereotypes and institutional barriers still limit the transformative potential of these legal commitments. The promise of universal human rights remains, for many women, an aspiration rather than a lived reality.

In light of these challenges, the international community faces a clear mandate: it must develop more robust and effective methods to guarantee enforcement of these rights, ensure that legal protections are translated into meaningful changes at the national and local levels, and acknowledge the complex, intersectional nature of equality. True justice recognizes that experiences of discrimination and marginalization are shaped by multiple, overlapping factors including race, class, age, disability, and sexual orientation and that achieving equality requires policies and practices that are responsive to this diversity.

Only by taking these steps can the vision captured in Article 1 of the UDHR freedom and equality in dignity and rights be transformed from lofty ideals into tangible experiences for women everywhere. It is when rights are reflected in the daily lives of women, in every society and circumstance, that the promise of international human rights finally fulfills its potential, bridging the gap between aspiration and reality.

Bibliography : 

(Bluebook 21st Edition)

1. U.N. Charter pmbl. (June 26, 1945).
2. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, Dec. 18, 1979, 1249 U.N.T.S. 13.
3. Id. art. 1.
4. Id. arts. 2–3.
5. Comm. on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendation No. 19, U.N. Doc. A/47/38 (1992).
6. Econ. & Soc. Council Res. 11 (II) (June 21, 1946).
7. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217 (III) A, U.N. Doc. A/810 (Dec. 10, 1948).
8. Convention on the Political Rights of Women, Mar. 31, 1953, 193 U.N.T.S. 135.
9. Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages, Dec. 10, 1962, 521 U.N.T.S. 231.
10. Declaration on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, G.A. Res. 2263 (XXII), U.N. Doc. A/RES/22/2263 (Nov. 7, 1967).
11. Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.177/20 (Sept. 15, 1995).
12. S. AFR. CONST., 1996; INDIA CONST. art. 15; BRAZIL CONST., 1988.
13. INDIA CONST. art. 15; CEDAW Ratification, U.N. Treaty Collection (July 9, 1993).
14. Forum for Women, Law and Development v. His Majesty’s Gov’t, N.K.P. 2002, Vol. 44, No. 5 (Nepal S.C.).
15. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, (1997) 6 S.C.C. 241 (India).
16. CEDAW, supra note 2, art. 4(1).
17. Comm. on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendation No. 25, U.N. Doc. A/59/38 (2004).
18. Id.
19. CEDAW, supra note 2, art. 18.
20. Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, Dec. 10, 1999, 2131 U.N.T.S. 83.
21. A.T. v. Hungary, Comm. No. 2/2003, CEDAW/C/36/D/2/2003 (Jan. 26, 2005).
22. UDHR, supra note 7, art. 1.
23. Rebecca Adami, Women and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 19 Hum. Rts. Rev. 349 (2018).
24. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171; International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Dec. 16, 1966, 993 U.N.T.S. 3.
25. U.N. Sustainable Development Goals, Goal 5 (2015).
26. Gonzales v. Mexico (Campo Algodonero), Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (ser. C) No. 205 (Nov. 16, 2009).
27. CEDAW Treaty Reservations, U.N. Treaty Collection (2024).
28. Hilary Charlesworth, What Are “Women’s International Human Rights”?, 8 Hum. Rts. Q. 625 (1986).