One Nation, One Election: A Comprehensive Analysis


Author name: Mishti jain, Jigyasa University (formerly Himgiri Zee University) Dehradun


Introduction


The term “One Nation, One Election” refers to the simultaneous conduct of elections for the Lok Sabha (India’s lower house of Parliament) and all state legislative assemblies. This is an ambitious proposal that streamlines the electoral process, saves money, and strengthens governance by saving time and resources spent on frequent elections. The idea has been around for some time, but recent debates have rekindled discussions about its feasibility, benefits, and challenges
Historical Background
India’s first elections after gaining independence in 1952 conducted both Lok Sabha and state assembly elections simultaneously. The trend remained in place until the late 1960s, when a few state assemblies were dismissed and staggered elections ensued. Over the years, state and central elections are now conducted independently, and the ECI administers a cycle of multiple elections annually. The ONOE proposal attempts to reinstate the original pattern by making an alignment of elections uniformly all over the country. Advocates argue that such a system could enhance democratic efficiency and strengthen governance, while critics raise concerns about its practicality and potential impact on federalism.
Benefits of One Nation, One Election .
1.  Cost Efficiency
The frequent elections will pose a heavy burden on the exchequer. The logistics, security, and administrative resources could be cut down drastically with simultaneous elections.
2. Administrative Ease
    Elections are quite manpower-intensive and time-consuming. A uniform process of election would simplify operations and release resources for other developmental activities.
3. Minimized Disruption
Elections more frequently and significantly interfere with the process of governance due to the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) primarily restricting policy decisions. ONOE will minimize such disturbance, allowing governments to proceed with long-range policy planning.
4. Increased Voter Participation
One election cycle may result in increased voter participation by removing election fatigue and making the process easier to vote.
5. Intensified Governance
A synchronized mandate for the central and state governments would reduce policy paralysis, ensuring better coordination and implementation of development programs.
Challenges and Criticisms
1. Constitutional and Legal Hurdles
ONOE would require significant constitutional amendments, especially in Articles 83, 85, 172, and 174, which define the term of legislatures. The challenge is to achieve consensus among political parties for such amendments.
2. Impact on Federalism
India’s federal structure allows the states to act independently in their domains. Some argue that the ONOE could undermine this, as central and state elections are inherently interlinked.
3. Logistical Complexity
Managing elections for over 900 million voters across a diverse country like India is already a Herculean task. Simultaneous elections would require massive resources, including additional Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trails (VVPATs).
4. Political Implications
In a simultaneous election, national issues could overshadow local concerns, and there is a risk of a “one-size-fits-all” approach, which may marginalize regional parties and undermine the representation of diverse interests.
5. Disruption in Case of Dissolution
If a state assembly or the Lok Sabha is dissolved before its term, it could upset the synchronized cycle. Developing mechanisms to handle such situations without resorting to staggered elections would be a tough challenge.
International States of Affairs
Many countries, including the United States, South Africa, and Indonesia, conduct simultaneous elections for different levels of government. However, these nations often have different governance structures and fewer administrative units than India, making direct comparisons challenging. Nevertheless, studying these systems could provide valuable insights for adapting ONOE to the Indian context. 
The Way Forward 
1. Phased Implementation
ONOE can be implemented in a phased manner rather than a pan-India rollout. For example, elections in states with the same term could be synchronized first and then expand to others.
2. Comprehensive Stakeholder Consultation
   Consensus building among political parties, civil society, and the general public is essential. Open discussions can address concerns and create trust in the proposed system.
3. Legal and Constitutional Reforms
The government must work closely with legal experts and the judiciary to draft amendments that uphold democratic principles while enabling ONOE. 
4. Strengthening Electoral Infrastructure
   Investments in technology, training, and logistics are essential to ensure the smooth conduct of simultaneous elections. 
5. Pilot Projects
Pilot projects would be conducted on a selective basis and in certain geographies to first identify potential risks and refine the process before it gains national implementation.
Conclusion  –
“The One Nation, One Election concept has great promises in terms of cost savings and administrative efficiency; however, with proper planning and widespread consensus through a robust legal framework, a lot of difficulties can be alleviated.”.Being the world’s largest democracy, India’s electoral system forms a core component of its governance. Any reform, including ONOE, should prioritize inclusiveness, transparency, and federal balance so that they fortify the democratic fabric of the nation. The long and complex road to simultaneous elections does not, however, detract from its benefits and therefore forms a goal to be pursued with cautious optimism.


FAQS


1.What is “One Nation, One Election”?
It is holding Lok Sabha elections simultaneously with state assemblies to reduce costs, streamline governance and minimize frequent election-related disturbances.


2. What are the benefits?
– Cost-effectiveness: It saves the cost of holding a series of elections.
– Governance continuity: Prevents the Model Code of Conduct to be enforced again and again that stops new policy initiatives.
– Less electoral exhaustion: Helps to avoid the exhaustion of electors from several elections.
– Better implementation of policies: Governments can work on governance without periodic electoral interruptions.


3. What are the difficulties?
– Operational intricacy: Holding simultaneous nationwide elections involves tremendous resources. Constitutional amendments: The Constitution and Representation of the People Act require changes. – Dissolution of state assemblies: Early or late dissolution of state assemblies is a problem. – Federalism impact: Critics say it will be detrimental to federalism.


4. Is it possible?
The Election Commission of India and experts have pointed out several reforms that are required, such as: Lok Sabha and assembly terms to be brought in line.Election infrastructure to be upgraded.


5. What are the constitutional implications?
Articles 83, 85, 172, and 356 need to be amended to bring election schedules in line. The other thing that is required is strong checks to deal with situations like early government fall.


6. Has it been done before?
India had simultaneous elections till 1967. Since then, the state and national election cycles have gone different ways because of early dissolutions of state assemblies and loksabha.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *